SCREEN

Gett: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem

When leaving a marriage isn’t up to you

Abigail Zamir
|
3 min read
Photo: Felix Kris & Alex Zuta / Transfax Film
Photo: Felix Kris & Alex Zuta / Transfax Film

Imagine that you’re in a marriage where love is gone. You’ve been in the relationship for many years, and decided that it’s time to live separately. Your spouse agrees, and for the past few years you’ve been living with your sister. Now comes the time to get a legal divorce, as you are married and want to move on with your life, be free from this bind, perhaps even start dreaming about seeing someone new. However, your spouse for some reason won’t grant you the divorce. Court date after court date, they won’t show up. This purgatory is the premise of the film Gett: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem.

In Israel, marriage and divorce are not governed by civil law but by religious authority. Jewish couples fall under the jurisdiction of the rabbinical courts, and a divorce, called a gett, is a document that can only be finalized when the husband agrees to give it. The wife can request it, argue for it, wait years for it, but she cannot compel it. Without her husband’s consent, she remains legally married, regardless of how long they’ve been separated or how mutual the desire to part.

Gett takes place almost entirely within the grey walls of a rabbinical courtroom, across five years of hearings. We follow Viviane Amsalem, played by Ronit Elkabetz, as she returns again and again before a panel of three rabbis, her husband Elisha sitting across from her, unmoved. The setting is deliberately spare, almost airless, and yet the film never feels static. The camera stays close, particularly on Viviane’s face, which almost becomes the film’s focal point. Waves of exhaustion, fury, hope and humiliation pass through her eyes in a single shot.

Ronit Elkabetz wrote the film together with her brother Shlomi, and this is the third part of a trilogy they built around Viviane. It begins with “To Take a Wife” (2004) and continues with “Shiva” (2007). Writing and performing the lead role gives the film an unusual gravitas. Ronit Elkabetz’s performance is full of emotion and restrained at the same time, a combination that is very hard to pull off. It’s a very personal film to me, and I’m sure to many other women as well, because it manages to pin point the exquisite pain of having your freedom taken away from you. 

The power of the rabbinical institution is portrayed through an accumulation of scenes, a building of tension that occurs through the entire film. We watch witness after witness take the stand and talk around Viviane’s life, her choices, her personality, as if she is evidence rather than a person. The rabbis are not portrayed as villains. They are men doing their jobs within a system they did not invent, occasionally even expressing sympathy. And somehow that is more unsettling than if they were simply cruel. 

Gett received critical acclaim, was selected as Israel’s entry for the Academy Awards in 2015, and was even nominated for a Golden Globe. Unfortunately, Ronit Elkabetz passed away in 2016 at the age of 51 from cancer, before she could see just how far the film’s reach would go. Her absence is still felt, but her body of work stands as her legacy and continues to resonate, especially Gett. Gett took something many women live through privately and put it, plainly and unflinchingly, on screen. Watching it reminds me of the power art has to reflect, challenge, and sometimes even change reality.

 

 

About the Author

Abigail Zamir is a writer, editor, and content manager at Citizen Café. She studied theatre at Tel Aviv University, writes fiction in both Hebrew and English, and runs creative writing workshops. She is also the kind of person who will argue with you about Israeli cinema for as long as you’ll let her, and believes a good short story and a cup of tea are all a person really needs.

Abigail Zamir

Discover More

Skip to main content

Hebrew Nugget:

Gett: The Trial of Viviane Amsalem

The past year has been an emotional rollercoaster – moving from the shock, pain, and sadness of unimaginable events to the moments of hope we felt with each hostage coming home, each family reunited, and every soldier returning safely. Alongside this, we’ve found countless reasons to be grateful – for the incredible outpouring of support from civilians, and for the things we still hold dear, like our families, our partners, and our community. But these feelings are always mixed with the ache and despair that everyone in Israel still carries, even now.
I’d say the best way to describe how everyone around me is feeling is רגשות מעורבים (reh-gah-shoht meh-oh-rah-veem), which means “mixed emotions.” רגש (reh-gehsh) means “an emotion” in singular, but in plural, רגשות, it might sound feminine with the “OHT” ending. But here’s the catch: this doesn’t change the gender of the noun or the adjective that follows, which still matches the singular form. So, it’s מעורבים and not מעורבות. It’s just one of those quirks of Hebrew that’s tricky to explain.